BA Speaks...

Sunday, July 3, 2011, 07:36 PM ( 48 views ) - Politics - Posted by Administrator
Anthony Weiner was a congressman representing the State of New York - Brooklyn/Queens. I think that’s all most people knew about Anthony Weiner until about a month ago. Now we know his wife is Huma Abedin, who, is the right-hand to Secretary of State Hilary Clinton; We know they’ve been married for 11 months and she is pregnant. We also know Mr. Weiner wears boxer briefs. Gray ones...

What we don’t know about Anthony Weiner is that he’s a virgo, 47-years-old and the middle child of a lawyer and a teacher - all boys; the oldest killed in a hit and run accident in 2000. He played hockey in college and actually aspired to be a television weatherman though he earned his bachelor’s degree in Political Science. He’s also been friends with The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart since 1987. That explains some of this.

By most accounts, Anthony Weiner did a great job for the people of Brooklyn/Queens. I’m sure he had a great time when in his district, but, as a congressman in Washington, his day consisted of boring hearings on the hill intertwined with lots of forced schmoozing. Add in a wife who travels constantly and a shutter-bug complex and we have our most recent political scandal. It’s almost formulaic.

This is a double-edged sword. I’ll start with what’s wrong in this scenario...
Weiner is married and a public figure. There is no good reason for him to think he has the anonymity to pull off something like this. Twitter is a public forum; computers can be hacked, as he so evasively pointed out. Even as a single man, shooting suggestive pictures across a public forum is just not a good idea for a public figure.

As a married man, I’m not so sure shooting suggestive pictures to your wife would go over well either, but, maybe I just predicted the next big political scandal. :-)

All puns intended, Weiner’s brain was not doing the thinking. THIS is a no-brainer...

The other side of this scenario is mostly based on comparisons. Many people said Weiner should resign not because of the pictures, but, because he lied. President Clinton lied - recanted - was impeached and still didn’t resign. And there was actual sex in his case, not to mention, he was THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. I would kill to hear what Bill had to say to Anthony about this. We know what Hilary said...

Democratic leadership said he should resign because he created the pictures utilizing elements of his official capacity. Bill and Monica had their fun in the oval office... at the desk. Doesn’t get more official capacity than that. And Clinton did not resign.

They also said the whole thing was too much of a distraction from the work that needed to get done. Congress doesn’t like to get interrupted in the middle of their no-results bickering. That is, when they are actually there. No wonder Anthony Weiner was taking pictures of himself... He was bored.

This should have been left to the people of Booklyn/Queens to decide. Maybe this is a sign that Anthony Weiner should be the mayor of New York City. They seem to be the only people who are willing to give him a rating based on his work, not his gender.

So, Should Anthony Weiner run for Mayor of New York City?
If he doesn't run for Mayor, what is his next step?

Friday, July 1, 2011, 12:42 PM ( 2 views ) - Media - Posted by Administrator
So, I'm a news snob. And, having spent the better part of a decade hunting down news, I feel justified as such. My favorite - The CBS Evening News... sorta.

I grew up watching CBS local and national news. They always seemed to have the best overall newscasts, even before I knew what that was supposed to look like. Even through the Dan Rather years - not a fan - CBS always had the best correspondents, which made the show. But, I can never get all things to line up... let me explain.

Dan Rather was a horrible anchor, but, they had good correspondents and the producers put the shows together well. Then Katie Couric came along - liked her as the anchor - but they lost the good correspondents. Now Scott Pelley is the anchor - not so much - the correspondents are just okay and the producers aren't stacking the shows out of the ballpark. Easy answer is to just change the channel, right? Let me further explain...

The night-time leader in newscasts is Brian Williams. Brian Williams is a nice man. I've met him. Nice man. But, I sense that their producers suck, they stack the shows like pringles and between Brian attempting to be "folksy" and what appears to be mediocre writers, the words just don't flow so well. Just my opinion.

Then there's Diane Sawyer. I can't watch her because she always looks like she's in pain as she delivers the news. HOWEVER, ABC World News has outrageous good correspondents and the producers and writer are A+ putting the shows together. Why can't they just get an anchor that doesn't induce squinting?

So, the verdict is: Scott Pelley is awesome as a 60 Minutes correspondent, but, CBS should leave it at that. He admits that he's not an anchor, so... The 60 Minutes magic isn't going to work if the magician doesn't have any tricks...


The new show should be called: The CBS Evening News with Harry Smith. Who's with me?








<<First <Back | 1 | 2 | 3 |